Martin Sebor wrote:
> [...]
> It occurs to me that we might be able to preempt a potentially
> contentious discussion by replacing the stdcxx Acknowledgment
> page with one describing the pre-stdcxx history of the project
> where we could retain any or all the names from the current
> acknowledgment page without having to tackle the delicate issue
> of who from the stdcxx community deserves to be mentioned.

FWIW, it seems to me that separate acknowledgment pages are required.

Liviu