stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r588290 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/windows/projectdef.js
Date Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:03:19 GMT
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [] 
>> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 11:34 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r588290 - 
>> /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/windows/projectdef.js
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> patched, but combining them may lead to some unstable 
>> results and also 
>>> bloated .pdb's without benefits to the debugger (?).
>> Footnote - source .pdb's for a static .lib file that you 
>> distribute /are/ interesting to the end user, but you 
>> shouldn't generate one source pdb anyways for both the static 
>> and dynamic compilation of the library.
>   The pdb for the static compilation and pdb for the dynamic
> compilation are different files.

Because the sources are or may be different depending on
the setting of the _RWSTDDEBUG macro, correct?

Sounds from what Bill is saying like APR is the same regardless.
Do the Microsoft libraries come with distinct .pdb files for
archive and shared libraries?


View raw message