stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r586502 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.0/include/rw/_config-msvcrt.h
Date Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:40:25 GMT
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 6:51 PM
>> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r586502 - 
>> /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.0/include/rw/_config-msvcrt.h
>>
>> I take it this is necessary for 4.2.0?
> 
>   Definitely. I've tested the 4.2.0 HEAD revision and got many
> linker errors in static builds. The same results you can see
> in nightly builds results. There all static builds are pink color.

Okay, let me also merge it out to 4.2.x (the latest -rc-6 tag
is based off of 4.2.x rather than 4.2.0 as all the previous
tags; going forward, i.e., after the 4.2.0 release, we will
continue to maintain and update 4.2.x for 4.2.1, 4.2.2, etc.,
but we won't touch the [misnamed] 4.2.0 branch).

> 
> http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/
> 
>> (If so, we will have to create a new release candidate.)
> 
>   I think we can also include the following patch in 4.2.0 release:
> http://www.nabble.com/__rw_once-warnings-in-non-reentrant-Windows-builds
> --tf4634599.html#a13295746

This makes it possible to do non-reentrant builds with MSVC 8
just like with MSVC 7, correct? I.e., it makes the 8s and 11s
build types non-reentrant when using MSVC 8, as they are in
stdcxx 4.1.3 (when using MSVC 7). If you're comfortable that
the patch is good for all compilers and build types I have no
objection. Does anyone have a problem with this?

Martin

Mime
View raw message