Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <46E066E6.4050603@roguewave.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:45:26 -0600
From: Andrew Black <ablack@roguewave.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.2.0-rc-3 and results
References: <46E05DDD.4010005@roguewave.com>
In-Reply-To: <46E05DDD.4010005@roguewave.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Greetings Martin

I've created the -rc-3 branch, though I realized that I blotched the
ChangeLog entry as I was reviewing the branch.

Performing a -rc-2 result run would be fairly simple, and would only
require updating the set of sources used for the release branch testing.
 However, I'd want to finish the current set of -rc-3 runs prior to
doing this.  The source file for the -rc-3 runs was updated last night
thanks to a minor change to the legacy test driver.

--Andrew Black

Martin Sebor wrote:
> I've added a page with the latest 4.2.0 results, soon to be tagged
> -rc-3:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.0-rc-3/results/
> 
> The only difference between -rc-3 and -rc-2 is support for Sun C++
> 5.9. There are no -rc-2 results yet (we haven't created any; Andrew,
> could we do that pretty easily?) The most recent results prior to
> rc-3 are for -rc-1:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.0-rc-1/results/
> 
> I expect to create an -rc-4 once I'm done with STDCXX-501. If we can
> get STDCXX-545 fixed soon, I'll include it in it as well. Otherwise,
> it'll go in the next (and hopefully final) 4.2.0 release candidate.
> 
> Martin