From stdcxx-dev-return-4858-apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Sep 10 23:59:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99943 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2007 23:59:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2007 23:59:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 6825 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2007 23:59:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6765 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2007 23:59:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6754 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2007 23:59:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:59:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.quovadx.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:58 +0000 Received: from qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com ([192.168.170.59]) by moroha.quovadx.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l8ANwupp030417 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:58:57 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:59:05 -0600 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs Thread-Index: AcfqpOgV4mlnGLJdS6WwnuagEOmmYgAr0gMAAAEH6KACK1KjIA== From: "Marc Betz" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have done the following: - modified the subtask stdcxx-504, add copyright notices, to delete the zip archives of the documents and replaced them with diffs created with svn diff. The changes only add copyright notices to the bottom of each page, changed to put this notice before rather than after the Google Analytics annotation, as requested by Martin, and a continuously visible copyright footer frame to the frames view.=20 There are no look and feel changes. - assigned myself subtask stdcxx-407, remove reference to Rogue Wave,=20 expanded its scope to include removing references to "SourcePro" and "module", as described in the comment. I attached diffs for the two documents reflecting these changes. This is all I will be doing for now as I need to focus on other work. Marc -----Original Message----- From: Travis Vitek [mailto:tvitek@quovadx.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 4:36 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs >From: Marc Betz >Subject: RE: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs > >No, that's all for now. I wanted to get these changes reviewed and=20 >checked in before starting the more substantive text changes. I don't understand why these changes have to be integrated before work is started on the 'more substantive text changes'. Is there some overlap that prevents them from being done independently? Seems that the changes should be completely unrelated. >[...] there may be other cosmetic changes we will want to make, but at=20 >least this has the needed copyright statements and a cleaner looking=20 >banner that correctly identifies the source of the documentation [...] I looked at the contents of the zip, and I don't see any copyright update. All I see is the two html documents and a few images, none of which include any copyright information. Unless you are talking about the changed logo, I don't see anything that identifies the documentation source either. >so I would suggest committing it as is, getting on with the text=20 >changes, and then revisiting this later. Back to my original comment. It sounds like you are convinced that you can't work on any more documentation updates until this stuff is submitted. Not everyone has commit rights, and for the time being it doesn't look like these changes are going anywhere. I think it might be simpler to create subtasks of STDCXX-506, one for updating the banners and layout, and another for updating the content and then proceed with the second task. Travis