stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zari...@epam.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r573337 - in /incubator/stdcxx/trunk: etc/config/windows/projects.js include/rw/_mutex.h src/i86/atomic.asm src/i86_64/atomic.asm src/once.cpp
Date Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:33:20 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 1:11 AM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r573337 - in 
> /incubator/stdcxx/trunk: etc/config/windows/projects.js 
> include/rw/_mutex.h src/i86/atomic.asm src/i86_64/atomic.asm 
> src/once.cpp
> 
> Is there any particular reason why the export directives 
> should be in once.cpp?
  No reason. The export directives can be in any .cpp file.

> We have an export.cpp (currently used 
> only by the EDG eccp C++ export feature) which seems like it 
> might be a better choice. Alternatively, we could add a new 
> file, say atomic.cpp.

> I don't suppose we could put the pragmas in the .asm files themselves?
  No, we can't.

> Is there a way to get the Windows infrastructure to pick up 
> these files automatically just like it does .cpp files so 
> that we avoid this kind of coupling?
  Done: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573571&view=rev

Farid.

Mime
View raw message