stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r553587 - /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/tests/self/
Date Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:03:04 GMT
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Sebor [] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 7:12 AM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r553587 - 
>> /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/tests/self/
>>>   No, because of _config-msvcrt.h, line 151:
>>>    // operator new and delete is not reliably replaceable across
>>>    // shared library boundaries, which includes the shared library
>>>    // version of the language support library #define 
>>>   Shall we install SIGSEGV signal handler only if 
>>> _RWSTD_NO_REPLACEABLE_NEW_DELETE macro is #defined ?
>> Right. Then the test for the replacement operator new should 
>> be guarded by the macro, shouldn't it?
>   I think it should, but then the all test should be guarded
> by the macro,
> because of all test cases in this test are excercising the replacement
> new/delete operators:

True. If there's no way to reliably replace operators new and delete
on Windows that's what we'll have to do. I thought I heard that it was
possible with some MSVC-specific hackery. If you can find some docs on
how to it that would great. If not, let's just guard the test (as we
do the uses of the replacement operator new machinery) and be done
with it.


View raw message