stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zari...@epam.com>
Subject RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

[...]

> time_get looks like a bug (or lack of  functionality) in our library

  time_get::date_order() returns time_get::do_date_order() which always
returns dateorder () == no_order (loc/_time_get.h; line 137).

  Also I observed that time_get::~time_get() should be protected
(22.2.5.1),
but in our library the time_get::~time_get() is not declared/defined.

  The same situation with ~time_get_byname(), ~time_put(),
~time_put_byname().

Farid.

Mime
View raw message