stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject [VOTE RESULT] Re: regression test suite naming convention
Date Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:13:42 GMT
I realized that we never closed this vote. Re-reading the thread
in the archive pretty much everyone was in favor of what's being
referred to as option (3) below with no objections to the
enhancement to add more detail after the section number so the
convention to follow is as follows:


with the dot-clause being optional if the test doesn't correspond
to a single specific clause.

For the record, the vote thread starts here:


Martin Sebor wrote:
> I also like option (3) best, so sounds like the home for
> the new regression tests is unanimously in tests/regress/
> The remaining question is the file name convention. Do we
> go with <section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp or do
> we allow things like:
> <section-number>.<dot-clause>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
> e.g., 23.vector.cons.stdcxx-123.cpp
> FWIW, I see no reason not to allow it since it provides
> additional useful detail.
> Martin
> Mark Brown wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From:
>>> Sent: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:56:30 -0600
>>> To:
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention
>>> If we constrain ourselves to the proposed options, my vote is for Option
>>> 2.  The reason for this vote is because it allows us to more easily
>>> determine what regression tests need to be run for a particular change.
>>> If we don't constrain ourselves to the proposed options, I wish to put
>>> forward an additional option.
>>> Option 3:
>>>     Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, using the following
>>>     naming convention:
>>>     tests/regress/<section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
>>> This option would allow us to quickly locate all regression tests, and
>>> identify which section each regression test applies to without
>>> consulting Jira.
>> I also think this option is better than the one I suggested. I suppose 
>> the file name could include even more specific detail than just the 
>> section number such as the name of the container or the member 
>> function, like vector.cons and so on.
>> -- Mark
>>> --Andrew Black
>>> Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>> I'm not hearing any yay's or nay's on the proposed convention
>>>> so how about a vote to practice our consensus building skills?
>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
>>>> Option 1:
>>>>   Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, naming each as
>>>>   follows:
>>>>   tests/regress/stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
>>>> Option 2:
>>>>   Mix regression tests in with the rest based on the clause
>>>>   in the standard and name each according to the following
>>>>   formula:
>>>>   tests/<section>/<section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
>>>> Martin

View raw message