Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <464B5D84.9010503@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:37:40 -0500
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
CC: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions raised by May report
References: <464B5C57.7060807@rowe-clan.net>
In-Reply-To: <464B5C57.7060807@rowe-clan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> * I'm qurious about http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/#committers.
>   Why some people are following CTR and others RTC?
> 
> quoting that page
> "Stdcxx Committers are Developers with commit (or write) access to the stdcxx
> codebase. Except where noted, all stdcxx committers follow the
> Review-Then-Commit policy. The list of current committers in alphabetical order
> is below:"
> 
> I think this is a misunderstanding, but perhaps worse.  The statement is that
> except where there is C-T-R code bases, svn operates under R-T-C.  I don't
> believe this was ment to apply to individuals, please correct me if I'm wrong.

Having read this more closely, I see the comment next to sebor.  My bad.

This isn't acceptable, in that each Project/Podling of the ASF operates as
a committee of equals.  Therefore this isn't a legitimate distinction.

STDCXX, would you rather operate entirely R-T-C, or C-T-R, for trunk?  You
can certainly call out *subversion* repositories or subsets that operate
differently, but again with the same rule applied to each committer.

Bill