stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Justin Erenkrantz" <>
Subject Re: [RFC] commit-then-review vs review-then-commit
Date Thu, 17 May 2007 05:15:55 GMT
On 5/16/07, Martin Sebor <> wrote:
> Yes, that probably makes more sense given that most of our changes
> have been of this nature (small isolated patches). Thanks for the
> suggestion, I'll offer it as one of the two options to vote on and
> let the majority decide between the two variations on the same
> theme:
> 1. CTR default with big/risky patches to follow RTC.
> 2. RTC default with simple patches to follow CTR.
> Unless there's more discussion I'll get the vote going tomorrow.

I think that #1 is the most 'Apache-y' way of doing things.  It's all
under version control, so you can't do too much harm.  -- justin

View raw message