stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anton Pevtsov <>
Subject RE: [VOTE] commit-then-review vs review-then-commit policy
Date Wed, 23 May 2007 14:32:32 GMT
[+1] All committers follow Commit-Then-Review for safe changes,
Review-Then-Commit for potentially breaking changes. What
constitutes a breakng change is a judgment call to be made
by each committer. The rule of thumb is that changes which
involve advanced/sophisticated C++ features, C99 features,
or optional POSIX (and other) extensions may cause breakage
on some platforms.

[-1] All committers follow Review-Then-Commit for all changes
with no exceptions.

[0] New committers and committers who haven't been active in
more than [4] months follow the RTC policy for at least
[4] weeks of sustained activity, all others CTR.

Anton Pevtsov

View raw message