stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject Re: Intel Thread Checker Support
Date Mon, 21 May 2007 23:17:13 GMT
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
> On May 20, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Eric Lemings wrote:
>>>  Questions for STDCXX users and maintainers regarding Intel Thread
>>> Checker (ITC):
>>>  1. Would STDCXX benefit from ITC support?
>> I don't know :) Does it reveal any problems in our code? Is it worth
>> the effort? From what I've heard from Liviu it sounds like a quite
>> a bit of work for not a whole lot of benefit.
> The main benefit of this exercise is to eliminate the false positives in 
> the ITC analysis of the code which uses stdcxx. This is the exactly what 
> I have avoided in the other libraries in the Core package by using the 
> ITC synchronization API.

That's a benefit to the users of stdcxx, not the project itself.
Which isn't to say that such a benefit is not unimportant, of

>> I think it would be good to see examples of bug in our code revealed
>> by the tool.
> I agree it would be a spectacular demonstration of the usefulness of the 
> tool but -- based on my knowledge of the stdcxx code -- I strongly doubt 
> I can demonstrate an MT bug in it. Do you know of an unresolved MT bug 
> in stdcxx?

There is a problem in locale (as usual, sigh :( A couple of our
thread safety tests have been crashing: 22_mt and 22_time_put_mt.


View raw message