stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Black <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] commit-then-review vs review-then-commit policy
Date Mon, 21 May 2007 22:53:29 GMT
My votes:

[+1] All committers follow Commit-Then-Review for safe changes,
      Review-Then-Commit for potentially breaking changes. What
      constitutes a breakng change is a judgment call to be made
      by each committer. The rule of thumb is that changes which
      involve advanced/sophisticated C++ features, C99 features,
      or optional POSIX (and other) extensions may cause breakage
      on some platforms.

[-1] All committers follow Review-Then-Commit for all changes
      with no exceptions.

[+1] New committers and committers who haven't been active in
      more than [6] months follow the RTC policy for at least
      [3] weeks of sustained activity, all others CTR.

View raw message