stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject [VOTE] commit-then-review vs review-then-commit policy
Date Mon, 21 May 2007 21:17:48 GMT
I think the discussion has wound down so let's have a vote and
decide whether stdcxx committers should follow the Commit-Then
Review (CTR) or Review-Then-Commit (RTC) policy on stdcxx/trunk
by default.

[ ]  All committers follow Commit-Then-Review for safe changes,
      Review-Then-Commit for potentially breaking changes. What
      constitutes a breakng change is a judgment call to be made
      by each committer. The rule of thumb is that changes which
      involve advanced/sophisticated C++ features, C99 features,
      or optional POSIX (and other) extensions may cause breakage
      on some platforms.

[ ]  All committers follow Review-Then-Commit for all changes
      with no exceptions.

[ ]  New committers and committers who haven't been active in
      more than [ ] months follow the RTC policy for at least
      [ ] weeks of sustained activity, all others CTR.

Please check the box you're voting for (or put +1/-1 in any or
all of them). When voting for #3, also put numbers in the two
[ ] boxes to complete the rules.


View raw message