stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Brown <>
Subject RE: TR1 Development Plan
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:38:54 GMT
Hi Eric,

I don't know if there is a development plan per se except for a number of Jira issues (one
for each section of the TR). Your suggestion to make the extensions available in namespace
std sounds like a fine idea to me.

I am also interested in the TR1 extensions but I haven't experimented with those in stdcxx
yet. I have spent most of my time so far trying to understand the stdcxx build process and
experimenting with the tests but as soon as I feel comfortable making more extensive changes
I would like to offer my help with the new hash-based containers.

-- Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> Sent: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:14:01 -0600
> To:
> Subject: TR1 Development Plan
> Hello all,
> I was wondering if there was a TR1 development plan in place, informal
> or otherwise, for TR1 development.  I noticed that there is some
> existing TR1 classes but the headers are rather old and they reside in
> the transitional std::tr1 namespace.
> I was thinking perhaps integrate the TR1 extensions directly into their
> eventual namespace and headers and enable or disable the TR1 extensions
> with a compile-time macro.  If the _RWSTD_ENABLE_TR1 or some such macro
> is defined (initially undefined by default), then the TR1 classes will
> be defined.
> If anyone has thoughts on the issue, please post them.  Also if there
> are docs somewhere that outline the plan for TR1, please point them out.
> Thanks,
> Eric.

FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks & orcas on your desktop!
Check it out at

View raw message