Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <17325091.1172784410683.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:26:50 -0800 (PST)
From: "Martin Sebor (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Assigned: (STDCXX-92) make config fails in parallel builds
In-Reply-To: <736732988.1136163601015.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-92:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Martin Sebor

> make config fails in parallel builds
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STDCXX-92
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-92
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.2
>         Environment: UNIX
>            Reporter: Martin Sebor
>         Assigned To: Martin Sebor
>
> From http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stdcxx-dev/200512.mbox/%3c43AC70E8.1070303@roguewave.com%3e:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: config failures
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:49:28 -0700
> From: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
> Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> References: <43AC64C1.1010404@roguewave.com>
> Liviu Nicoara wrote:
> > Caused by parallel builds. :-(
> Which are explicitly mentioned in the README as not working. But who
> reads documentation, right? (I'm not being facetious.)
> It might be a nice enhancement to get the configuration infrastructure
> to work with the parallel option.
> OTOH, I've been thinking about rewriting the infrastructure so as not
> to rely on (recursive invocations of) make, e.g., in awk or some other
> portable language, for efficiency. This enhancement would be even more
> welcome than the parallelization.
> Both of these are probably going to be involved, so until we find the
> time and energy to tackle them, the easiest enhancement to make the
> configuration more user-friendly is probably to change GNUmakefile.cfg
> to detect and prevent parallel builds altogether.
> Martin

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.