Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C755A1.F81456AB"
Subject: JIRA issues: resolve or close or resolve then close ?
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:20:54 +0200
Message-ID: <F92433E3D38672499C549EB615AFADA0C61690@exkiv.kyiv.vdiweb.com>
Thread-Topic: JIRA issues: resolve or close or resolve then close ?
thread-index: AcdVofgG7sQlCrjESgabsuGOVA56QA==
From: "Farid Zaripov" <FaridZ@kyiv.vdiweb.com>
To: <stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C755A1.F81456AB
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

  Usually I used 'resolve' action.
=20
  I thought that 'resolve issue' means 'do something to fix the issue
and then close'
and 'close issue' means 'do nothing and just close', but today I've
looked into JIRA
workflow
(http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/v3.7.2/default_workflow.htm
l)
and seen that 'closed' state is the final state of the issue.
=20
  Shall I close all issues which are resolved by me?
=20
  Do we have any rule on that matter?
=20
  Hmm, I was wrong: the 'closed' state is not final (it's just lowest at
the state diagram)
because an issue always can be reopened...
=20
Farid.
=20

------_=_NextPart_001_01C755A1.F81456AB--