Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68880 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2006 00:07:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2006 00:07:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 63450 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2006 00:07:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63390 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2006 00:07:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63379 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2006 00:07:21 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:07:21 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.quovadx.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:07:09 -0800 Received: from [10.70.3.48] ([10.70.3.48]) by moroha.quovadx.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA106cS0009595 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 00:06:39 GMT Message-ID: <4547E516.8010602@roguewave.com> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:06:46 -0700 From: Andrew Black User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060910 SeaMonkey/1.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Windows infrastructure bug References: <45479F29.4020007@roguewave.com> <4547D246.2090200@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <4547D246.2090200@roguewave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Martin Sebor wrote: > Andrew Black wrote: >> Greetings Farid. >> >> I checked the provided test case again on my local installation, and >> discovered that it does not replicate the issue. >> >> After further digging, I have found that the problem seems to have >> been the use of the %G or %H variable in a for loop prior to invoking >> devenv. This was worked around by using the SETLOCAL/ENDLOCAL >> directives. >> >> As batch scripts alter their environment unless the SETLOCAL command >> is used, I had been reducing my test case in an environment where >> these variables were undesirably set. > > So is the original problem now resolved? > > Martin Kinda. The glue script now works (and making the variables local I believe to be a positive change), but the observed issue of stray environment variables throwing the sanity test script off probably should be looked into at some point. --Andrew Black