stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject Re: problem with config.h
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:52:39 GMT
Duft Markus wrote:
> hey there!
> i have following problem: i'm writing a compiler wrapper (interix-wgcc,
> on sourceforge) for which i want to use stdcxx as the default STL
> implementation. the only problem is, that the config.h will conflict
> with every single config.h generated by autotools managed packages. so i
> for now did the following:
> i changed rw/_config.h to be
> the script is needed anyway, so for now this is not a too big problem,
> but it would be really cool if config.h would be something else, like
> rwstd_config.h or so...

Yes, the name is far from ideal. I've been thinking about making
it configurable, perhaps by replacing the _RWSTD_USE_CONFIG macro
with _RWSTD_CONFIG=<config-header-pathname>. The patch below has
all the source changes necessary to make it work (the rest of the
changes need to go in the makefiles and VisualStudio scripts).
I suggest you create an enhancement request in Jira for this to
help us remember to get it done.


Index: /build/sebor/stdcxx/include/rw/_config.h
--- /build/sebor/stdcxx/include/rw/_config.h    (revision 436919)
+++ /build/sebor/stdcxx/include/rw/_config.h    (working copy)
@@ -31,7 +31,9 @@

+#  include _RWSTD_CONFIG
+#elif defined (_RWSTD_USE_CONFIG)
  #  include <config.h>
  #  include <rw/config/rwconfig_std.h>

View raw message