stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject Re: [PATCH]
Date Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:04:20 GMT
Andrew Black wrote:
> Take two on the patches are attached (removing most of the whitespace 
> changes).
> I've done a little more cleanup on the patterns (including removing the 
> unneeded escapes within the [] blocks), and I think the pattern is about 
> as simple as I can get it.  It would be possible to remove some of the 
> capture braces, but I decided against this, as it would remove some of 
> the similarities between the pairs of patterns that can provide a 
> measure of context to other developers working on the code.
> I'm not certain if standardization would be the most accurate 
> description of what I did, but it is accurate enough.  The (basically) 
> same pair of patterns was used in 3 different locations, and I replaced 
> all these instances with a single pair of patterns.

I see. So by standardization you mean making semantically equivalent
expressions syntactically identical, and not avoiding non-standard
(as in non-portable) constructs.

I clarified your changelog to that effect and committed both patches


View raw message