Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63347 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2006 01:00:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2006 01:00:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7652 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2006 01:00:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7642 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2006 01:00:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7631 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2006 01:00:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:00:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.quovadx.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:00:49 -0700 Received: from qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com (qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com [192.168.170.59]) by moroha.quovadx.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7I10Pk0029319 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:00:27 GMT Received: from [10.70.3.113] ([10.70.3.113]) by qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:00:37 -0600 Message-ID: <44E51132.1000102@roguewave.com> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:00:34 -0600 From: Martin Sebor Organization: Rogue Wave Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [patch] exec utility windows port References: <44DA6A90.50006@roguewave.com> <44DA7D4D.7080100@roguewave.com> <44DB9766.4030004@roguewave.com> <44DBDEF7.9030301@roguewave.com> <44DCF336.9030805@roguewave.com> <44E11F68.7080604@roguewave.com> <44E204BF.6000607@roguewave.com> <44E36756.7010003@roguewave.com> <44E4D494.5040007@roguewave.com> <44E4E4A3.4030502@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <44E4E4A3.4030502@roguewave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2006 01:00:37.0695 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7BE34F0:01C6C261] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Andrew Black wrote: > And, take 2 on the patch. I believe I've resolved the issue with soft > killing the child processes, but I am not completely happy with it. Part > of this reason for this unhappiness is that the MSDN documentation on > process creation flags seems to indicate that the Control-C signal > handling is disabled on the new process group. Unfortunately, I don't > think there's any way around this. Still, I don't see error messages > when a child process is killed, so I think it will work. Looks good! Committed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432452&view=rev Let's see what Farid says -- I assume this will be integrated into the next version of the Windows build infrastructure, right? Thanks Martin PS Your changelog is a work of art! ;-)