stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject Re: test for lib.string.cons
Date Tue, 16 May 2006 16:17:42 GMT
Anton Pevtsov wrote:
> Martin Sebor wrote:
>>I committed the user-defined allocator yesterday so that we can get
> started on enhancing the tests to use it. Since I haven't thoroughly
> tested UserAlloc yet let me do one test first to iron out    > any
> kinks.
> I tried to use the UserAlloc to enhance the cons test. It required
> changes in 21.strings.cpp - I wrote a two new macros:
> and TEST_DISPATCH_ALLOC to call fname with allocator. 
> The test was successfully passed.

Great! I expect we'll just change the existing macros instead
of adding new ones, right?

> Martin Sebor wrote:
>>The other tests will need to verify that the class uses the allocator
> object to allocate all storage and for any other operations (i.e., uses
> and honors max_size(), uses address(), construct(),       > destroy(),
> etc.). This will have to be done conditionally only for UserAlloc (i.e.,
> analogously to how we test that Traits::eq() and Traits::length() are
> used).
> Ok, I'll verify this.

Cool, thanks!

View raw message