Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70688 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2006 23:07:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2006 23:07:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 86064 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2006 23:07:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86051 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2006 23:07:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86040 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2006 23:07:04 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:07:04 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [12.17.213.84] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (12.17.213.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:07:01 -0800 Received: from [10.70.3.113] (10.70.3.113 [10.70.3.113]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id ZGW28RDV; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:59:04 -0700 Message-ID: <43E7D777.8090500@roguewave.com> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:10:47 -0700 From: Martin Sebor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: bug in unique_copy? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I just noticed the bug report below. Our implementation fails the supplied test case just like (apparently) libstc++ must. It would be good to look into it and open an issue if it is in fact a bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26133