stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Benito ...@benito.com>
Subject Re: stdcxx question
Date Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:29:16 GMT
Eric,

I decided to comment out the MAPFILE setting in the makefile.in file in my 
BUILDDIR.  That seems to let the library build just fine.

Thanks,

jb -


Eric Lemings wrote:
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:03 PM
>>To: John Benito; stdcxx-user@incubator.apache.org; 
>>stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: stdcxx question
>>
>>
>>John Benito wrote:
>>
>>>Martin,
>>>
>>>Thanks for the quick and correct response.  By specifying the full 
>>>path
>>>for BUILDDIR, I get a lot farther in the process.  I am now 
>>
>>hitting a 
>>
>>>makefile
>>>issue in that mapfile.gcc-4 and no rule to make the target, 
>>
>>and in fact 
>>
>>>I do
>>>not seem to have a mapfile.gcc-4.  Do I need to download a 
>>
>>mapfile.gcc-4?
>>
>>No, I'm afraid there isn't one. The project wasn't fully 
>>ported to gcc 4 at the time of the snapshot, and this bit 
>>still isn't implemented today (you should be able to build 
>>and use an archive library with gcc without needing this 
>>file). You should also be able to avoid this error when 
>>building a shared library by deleting the line that defines 
>>the MAPFILE make variable from the generated 
>>$BUILDDIR/makefile.in file.
> 
> 
> ...or do what I did and just link gcc-4 to gcc-3.  It seems to
> build and work just fine.
> 
> Eric.
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message