Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <430DE8E2.9060004@roguewave.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:50:58 -0600
From: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marc Betz <mbetz@roguewave.com>
CC: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: stdcxx documentation format (was Re: stdcxx)
References: <430CA2E2.7090909@alessio.marchetti.name>
 <430CBF72.9000905@roguewave.com> <430CC476.7000906@alessio.marchetti.name>
 <430CDFEE.6000804@roguewave.com> <430DDD46.2080904@alessio.marchetti.name>
In-Reply-To: <430DDD46.2080904@alessio.marchetti.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Alessio Marchetti wrote:
> Martin Sebor wrote:
> 
>> FYI: The docs were generated from the original FrameMaker master
>> sources.  There might be other formats that FrameMaker can generate
>> but I believe HTML was considered the easiest one of them for the
>> community to work with. If you have a suggestion for a different
>> format that we could generate from the master sources that would
>> easier to work with, let me know so we can regenerate them now
>> before any changes have been made.
>>
> my suggestion is to generate XML docbook 4.3
> don't know how easy would that be to move form your FrameMaker MIF file 
> to XML with the tools that you have available, but XML docbook is 
> definitely a pretty standard approach

Let me pass this on the Marc, our techdocs person, to see what
he thinks about the idea (if it's even possible). Marc?

Martin