stanbol-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Trying to understand the level of activity in Stanbol community
Date Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:02:31 GMT
Hi Furkan,

Glad to hear that. Is there any specific open task that you want to start
addressing or any proposal for the backlog?

Cheers,
Rafa

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:12 AM Muhammad Sajjad <muhammad.sajjad@kics.edu.pk>
wrote:

> yes of course.
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 10:26 AM Furkan KAMACI <furkankamaci@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm *Furkan KAMACI* who is a person loves open source, Java, and Machine
> > Learning. I'm Committer and PMC member of Apache Gora, Apache Nutch, and
> > Committer of Apache ManifoldCF and also a member of The Apache Software
> > Foundation.
> >
> > I've developed software and managed teams which creates products on
> > analyzing Petabytes of data to run efficient Machine Learning and Search
> > algorithms on Big Data. I have a work experience +10 years including
> > companies as like Alcatel-Lucent/Nokia and has an academical background.
> > Currently, I have a company named as LAGOM which works on Big Data and
> > Machine Learning and contributes to open source projects.
> >
> > I've contributed to many ASF projects throughout the years including
> Gora,
> > ManifoldCF, Nutch, Solr/Lucene and of course *Stanbol*. I was a GSoC
> > student for Stanbol 4 years ago but I couldn't deep into dive with
> Stanbol
> > due to my health problems.
> >
> > I would like to take responsibility and contribute to *Apache Stanbol*
> as a
> > Committer/PMC.
> >
> > PS: My Apache and GitHub id is *kamaci*.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Furkan KAMACI
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:50 AM Phillip Rhodes <
> motley.crue.fan@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey guys, I'm definitely still very interested in Stanbol and would
> > > like to see it remain an active project here at ASF.  I haven't had
> > > much opportunity to contribute up to this point, but I remain
> > > committed to getting more deeply involved and starting to contribute.
> > > It's hard to commit to a specific level or a specific timeline, but I
> > > can say that my plan is definitely to try and get equipped to start
> > > contributing to Stanbol.
> > >
> > >
> > > Phil
> > > ~~~
> > > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 AM Dileepa Jayakody
> > > <dileepajayakody@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Roman, Rafa and fellow Stanbolers.
> > > >
> > > > I'm Dileepa Jayakody, a committer of Apache Stanbol project since
> 2014.
> > > > While I was engaging in the dev list and development of the project
> for
> > > > couple of years, due to other engagements, I must admit my
> > contributions
> > > > have been very low since.
> > > >
> > > > However, I think there is a lot we can do to revive the project.
> > > > Looking at the Jira tracker[1] I think we can start by fixing the
> bugs
> > > and
> > > > work towards a new release. Would love to see Stanbol active again,
> and
> > > see
> > > > the senior developers back on the list :)
> > > >
> > > > I will start to engage again as much as possible.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dileepa
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STANBOL/summary
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:15 PM Rafa Haro <rharo@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Roman,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm Rafa Haro, current PMC member of Apache Stanbol. I think we
> have
> > > > > discussed this situation a couple of times in the past few months.
> > > There
> > > > > were a similar inquiry recently and back then, at least 3 "active"
> > > > > (including me) PMC members responded with similar answers: we would
> > be
> > > > > somehow available for bug fixing, attend the mailing lists and so
> on
> > > but,
> > > > > because of lack of time, further contributions like working on the
> > > backlog,
> > > > > community development....had to be eventually abandoned. I think
> this
> > > > > situation is extensible to most of current committers. Within the
> > same
> > > > > threads, there were Stanbol's users that were interesting in taking
> > the
> > > > > project out of this "blockage" but the reality is that this
> situation
> > > has
> > > > > remained the same for months and the activity at the mailing lists
> is
> > > > > minimum. So maybe yeah, probably it is a shame and maybe it is time
> > to
> > > > > archive the project.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure which are the implications of putting the project into
> > the
> > > > > Attic from the organisation point of view, but in my honest opinion
> > it
> > > is
> > > > > that or, somehow, I don't know exactly how, try to find or extend
> the
> > > > > community with new members interested in further improvements and
> > uses
> > > > > cases around Stanbol that could lead to resurrect the project.
> > > > >
> > > > > Warm regards from Seville
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a few months ago Shane Curcuru started this discussion
> > > > > > > around the level of PMC activity in the project:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f85aecc5180b85d888cf63a8136521739e5e1ee74ae167abd3ab9ff@%3Cdev.stanbol.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > at the time it seemed like the consensus was: there's
> > > > > > > enough folks interested in at least overseeing mechanics
> > > > > > > of the PMC. However if a few months since it would seem
> > > > > > > that we're back to where Shane's discussion started.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, this is, of course, based on my cursory review of
mailing
> > > > > > > list and JIRA activity, but it seems that out of the current
22
> > PMC
> > > > > > > members only one or two are active (and I don't mean writing
> > > > > > > code active, but at least supporting "mechanics" of the
PMC):
> > > > > > >    http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=stanbol
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm wondering, perhaps, if it would benefit the project
to
> > consider
> > > > > > > expanding the PMC to include the other 4 committers and/or
> > > > > > > some of the project's active users.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Again!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it seems that there hasn't been much of a feedback on this thread
> > so
> > > > > > I'm expanding it to users@ as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The concern here is that unless the community comes up with
at
> > least
> > > 3
> > > > > > reasonably active PMC
> > > > > > members to make sure that the project can continue it may be
end
> up
> > > > > > "archived" into Apache Attic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, these PMC members do NOT have to be existing PMC members,
if
> > > > > > there's enough enthusiastic
> > > > > > folks in the user community we can definitely look into
> "rebooting"
> > > > > > the PMC that way.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If anybody is interested in making sure that Stanbol continues
as
> > an
> > > > > > active Apache project -- please
> > > > > > reply to this thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Roman.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message