Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stanbol.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stanbol.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEWfVJk97BLGnJYYeCp2AbDdgZBwvO3a0L4dFRpNvq7ZJ5OQkA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+_sZ+jM=bOUHJOHLUAci-vOkOnZ1Pj6v_2+XdYXKHF-Ao5qAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEWfVJk97BLGnJYYeCp2AbDdgZBwvO3a0L4dFRpNvq7ZJ5OQkA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fabian Christ <christ.fabian@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 17:26:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+_sZ+ir9Yh+wP-kkZEA3WE6GvwyG7LtKFU7Z8OADu+A5RxaWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] Apache Stanbol - May 2017
To: dev@stanbol.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
archived-at: Tue, 09 May 2017 15:26:58 -0000

Hi,

I think we have these three PMC members (at least). Correct me, if I
am wrong but I would count

- Rupert
- Rafa
- Myself (Fabian)

to be at least able to cut releases and respond to security issues if needed.

So, I would add that to the report. Any comments?

Best
Fabian


2017-05-09 16:28 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>:
> Hi Fabian and Stanbol PMC,
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Fabian Christ <fchrist@apache.org> wrote:
>> ...The PMC is aware of the situation but at the moment the lack
>> of time and availability of persons make it very difficult
>> to change something fundamentally....
>
> The board will ask whether Stanbol has 3 active PMC members who can
> become active if needed, for example to handle security reports and
> make the corresponding releases.
>
> If you can find out before the board meeting it would be good to add
> that info to the report.
>
> In general having somewhat inactive projects is not a real problem, as
> long as there are 3 active PMC members, so it's good to include that
> info.
>
> Ciao,
> -Bertrand


-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt