stanbol-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alessandro Adamou <alessandro.ada...@studio.unibo.it>
Subject Re: [REPORT] Apache Stanbol - May 2017
Date Wed, 10 May 2017 15:48:46 GMT
Hi - I think I can say for myself the same as Andreas did.


best


Alessandro

________________________________
Da: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
Inviato: martedì 9 maggio 2017 19.25.55
A: dev@stanbol.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: [REPORT] Apache Stanbol - May 2017

While not active currently I am at least trying to read the mails on the
mailing list. And if any serious issue would come up I would try to help
resolve it.

Cheers,
Andreas
---

Fabian Christ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we have these three PMC members (at least). Correct me, if I
> am wrong but I would count
>
> - Rupert
> - Rafa
> - Myself (Fabian)
>
> to be at least able to cut releases and respond to security issues if needed.
>
> So, I would add that to the report. Any comments?
>
> Best
> Fabian
>
>
> 2017-05-09 16:28 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>:
>> Hi Fabian and Stanbol PMC,
>>
>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Fabian Christ <fchrist@apache.org> wrote:
>>> ...The PMC is aware of the situation but at the moment the lack
>>> of time and availability of persons make it very difficult
>>> to change something fundamentally....
>>
>> The board will ask whether Stanbol has 3 active PMC members who can
>> become active if needed, for example to handle security reports and
>> make the corresponding releases.
>>
>> If you can find out before the board meeting it would be good to add
>> that info to the report.
>>
>> In general having somewhat inactive projects is not a real problem, as
>> long as there are 3 active PMC members, so it's good to include that
>> info.
>>
>> Ciao,
>> -Bertrand
>
>
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message