stanbol-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alberto Musetti <muse...@cs.unibo.it>
Subject Re: Add refactor engine in enhancer/bundlelist
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:20:24 GMT
Hi Rupert, all
I'm working on it, but i'm proceeding slowly because i cannot reproduce the error.

i'm sorry
Alberto

Il giorno 02/mar/2012, alle ore 00:20, Rupert Westenthaler ha scritto:

> Hi Alberto
> 
> I spent some time to look into "Build failed in Jenkins: stanbol-trunk-1.6 #772"
> 
> The most interesting file is the error.log file of the Stanbol
> instance used for the integration test.
> 
>   https://builds.apache.org/job/stanbol-trunk-1.6/ws/trunk/integration-tests/target/launchdir/sling/logs/error.log
> 
> For the first view calls to the enhancer everything looks fine (~5sec
> for the Refactor engine).
> 
> But later - after time code "01.03.2012 19:49:21.04" (use this to
> search in the file) something starts to went wrong with Jena TDB.
> 
> [Thread-36] >> seo_refactoring  and
> [Thread-12] >> looks like a Jena TDB demon
> 
> are the only active one (looks a little like a deadlock).
> 
> You can safely ignore the [DataFileTrackingDaemon] this checks only
> every 5sec for Resources of the DataFIleProvider.
> 
> I have really no idea what is going on here. Maybe you can make more
> sense of this
> 
> best
> Rupert
> 
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alberto Musetti <musetti@cs.unibo.it> wrote:
>> Hi Rupert, all
>> 
>> Il giorno 29/feb/2012, alle ore 19:14, Rupert Westenthaler ha scritto:
>> 
>>> Hi Alberto
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 29.02.2012, at 18:48, Alberto Musetti wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> I would like to add the refactor engine in enhancer/bundlelist.
>>>> It will be activated in the launcher full and full-war,
>>>> but not in stable because there isn't rules and ontonet.
>>>> 
>>>> May I add the refactor engine?
>>>> 
>>> I think the full launcher should include all engines that are managed by the
Stanbol Community. So in principle a +1 from my side.
>>> 
>>> Can I ask two questions:
>>> 
>>> (1) What would that mean for the memory footprint. I usually run Stanbol with
-Xmx512m.  Would that still work with the refactor engine?
>> 
>> Yes, it would still work.
>> Concerning performance and memory usage we are adding full support to Clerezza
>> in the Refactor with spending effort and memory in graph tansformations.
>> 
>>> 
>>> (2) Would the engine be active by default? Do you plan to ship the full launcher
with a default configuration or would a user need to manually configure an instance?
>>> 
>> 
>> There is a default configuration running  at bundle start-up,
>> i.e., the refactoring for the SEO demo.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Alberto
>> 
>>> best
>>> Rupert
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> | Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstra├če 11                             ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen


Mime
View raw message