stanbol-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephane Gamard <stephane.gam...@salsadev.com>
Subject Re: Stanbol Enhancement Structure (discussion)
Date Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:54:30 GMT

On Mar 1, 2011, at 7:28 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:

> I agree, I find the dc:type property confusing, I would rather have
> sb:entity-type property with a list of recommended toplevel types
> stating that domain specific types are also acceptable but won't
> probably be handled by the sample clients.
> 
> Also for the Tag vs Entity vs Keyword debate, I would add Topics (as
> in skos:Concept) to the debate: for instance a document could be about
> a topic such as "Business" or "Sport" and a subtopic such as
> "Football". Those are no Entities per se, and do not have
> "occurrences" in the content items: this is a global qualifier for the
> content of the document.
> 
> I this the "keyword" or "key term" or "keyphrase" enhancement type is
> still interesting to reflect the most important terms or phrases of a
> document (as extracted by SalsaDev for instance) without trying to
> perform the disambiguation step required to link those terms to a
> particular meaning using a public LOD URI (such as a dbpedia or
> wordnet link for instance). Such ambiguous keyterms can still be
> useful to perform a "related" websearch query on Yahoo BOSS for
> instance.

+1. As this is an ongoing internal debate here at SD (what really is a tag versus a keyword
vs keyterm concept, ... ). Are there some central thread were we can brainstorm? 



Mime
View raw message