From dev-return-35626-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@sqoop.apache.org Wed Feb 14 16:12:19 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CD9B180621 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:12:18 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 41354 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2018 15:12:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@sqoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@sqoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@sqoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41343 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2018 15:12:18 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) (207.244.88.137) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:12:18 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id AE113C30 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a84so12000681wmi.5 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:12:16 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCFr3ddJ8Xns1o5/bNMXFRiTiNKDnZfkNt56wtVPUtmOIcI++Vt K36ZZrIHCY+OWgSRX1Q6gjs0MgHkFbraczYycXQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226yLr8JM17dkFGBC+lG7ydTQqm9be2mpa+prQDCgLThcF/bDogPwy+K4mKFWuHe2do2cx/RzWOW0X0+6Rt103g= X-Received: by 10.28.105.79 with SMTP id e76mr4237200wmc.21.1518621134743; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:12:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.130.2 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:12:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Attila_Szab=C3=B3?= Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:12:14 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question: Third party docker support file version To: =?UTF-8?Q?Attila_Szab=C3=B3?= Cc: dev@sqoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146adc048f8a905652d8900" --001a1146adc048f8a905652d8900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I've also found another strange thing: It seems oracle/database:12.2.0.1-ee is no longer available on dockerhub, thus the usage of these scripts are very difficult at the beginning, and needs lots of workarounds (of course it's feasible to clone github, build the oracle image, etc., but it's very far from the original goal) to make it work (nonetheless it's very much not working out of the box). Do we plan to do anything with this? (e.g. creating an official Sqoop id for dockerhub, and push their the prebuilt image or so). If yes I'd more than happy to provide my help, guidance on this front. Cheers, Attila Virus-free. www.avg.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Attila Szab=C3=B3 wro= te: > Hi all, > > A few months ago Szabi created start and stop scripts for docker-compose, > to run 3rd party DBs for the 3rd party tests, which is great ( it's > intention is to make the integration testing of Sqoop much easier ). > > Though the version of docker-compose file is 3+, thus it's only usable > with the quite recent docker-compose+docker versions. > > And here comes the problem: > The latest version of CentOS (7.4) by default comes a much older > Docker+Docker-compose version, which is incompatible with the compose fil= e > version. So out of the box, this solution won't work on the latest CentOS > version for example (I've discovered it b/c one of my test servers runs > CentOS7.4). > > I'm not telling it's impossible to install it from the net (first docker > and then docker compose), but it's just not the standard/convenient/stabl= e > solution which would come from the RPM package. > > Here comes my question: > What do you think: is it possible, and would it make sense to rewrite the > docker compose file to version 2, and thus providing an EZ way to use thi= s > feature by the majority of the Linux users? Is there any vital feature in > version 3 what is required for this task? > > Keeping it simple: > Would it be possible to provide a much wider usable version of this docke= r > based testing solution, or would we like to keep and handle it as an > experimental testing feature? > > Thanks, > Attila > --001a1146adc048f8a905652d8900--