sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jarek Jarcec Cecho (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-1644) Sqoop2: Enhance the connector/ driver config input options for better usability
Date Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:51:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14191879#comment-14191879
] 

Jarek Jarcec Cecho commented on SQOOP-1644:
-------------------------------------------

I'm afraid that having two systems doing the same will be confusing for the connector developer
especially when/if there will be conflicts (what if one system says that it's optional and
second will say that it's required)? I agree that simple things should be simple to do, but
that doesn't mean that we have to have two systems for that, right? We can design the conditions
in a way that there will be easy way to specify "always optional" or "always required".

>  Sqoop2: Enhance the connector/ driver config input options for better usability
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1644
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1644
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
>            Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> The goal is to have much better user experience when user has to fill out the values
for config inputs in the UI/ shell client.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message