sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Veena Basavaraj (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-1629) Sqoop2: Add unique constraint on the Config table for name and type
Date Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:39:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14187161#comment-14187161

Veena Basavaraj commented on SQOOP-1629:

Sure, I think Abe you have a ver good point.

How about adding the connector/ configurbale Id to the constraint as well so we make it explicit
what we wanted. Atleast within a connector we want uniqueness, so this will enforce it at
database level.

Second, from the point of view of SQOOP-1515 we should just stick to using config Ids for
reusability.  So when creating a LINK or JOB I can give the link-config Id= 1 and then similalry
for from/to/driver

> Sqoop2: Add unique constraint on the Config table for name and type
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: SQOOP-1629
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1629
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
>            Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>         Attachments: SQOOP-1629.patch, SQOOP-1629.patch, SQOOP-1629.patch
> this helps create top level config objects and use their names while creating the LINK
and JOB entities

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message