sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Abhijeet Gaikwad (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-722) Improve Sqoop 2 packaging
Date Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:00:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13506588#comment-13506588

Abhijeet Gaikwad commented on SQOOP-722:

Thanks for clarifying Jarcec.
On your first suggestion, I feel packaging source and binaries are two independent tasks and
should not be merged into one.

> Improve Sqoop 2 packaging
> -------------------------
>                 Key: SQOOP-722
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-722
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>         Attachments: bugSQOOP-722.patch
> I would like to propose two improvements to current building (dist module):
> * Build both source and binary artifacts at the same time. As as I understand a lot of
other projects are doing that as well and it seems more friendly than creating one package
at the time.
> * Encode hadoop profile into binary artifact name. I believe that we should encode for
which Hadoop version is given binary artifact suitable. I know that only two jars are actually
"hadoop specific" whereas the others will work across all hadoop distributions, but I believe
that it will be more user friendly.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message