Will do.
Jarcec
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:17:41AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Jarcec,
>
> Just to be sure that we are voting on consistent set of binaries, I suggest
> that you copy them over to r3 candidate directory and restart the VOTE
> thread. Thanks for taking this through.
>
> Arvind
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jarcec@apache.org>wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much for your testing sir. I'm not quite sure how my
> > temporal directory went to release tarbals, however I missed it and I'm
> > sorry for that.
> >
> > I've repacked 0.20 and 1.0.0 tarball (including signature and md5sum). Do
> > I need to restart the voting as well?
> >
> > Jarcec
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:38:09PM -0800, Bilung Lee wrote:
> > > Look good overall, but one thing though. You would need to get rid of
> > the
> > > redundant "jarcec" directory in those two new (0.20 and 1.0.0) binary
> > > tarballs.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jarcec@apache.org
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
> > > > 1.4.1-incubating.
> > > >
> > > > Changes from -r1:
> > > >
> > > > * Fixed LICENSE.txt files (Thanks Bilung!)
> > > > * Binary artifacts for all supported versions (Thanks Arvind!)
> > > >
> > > > *** Please cast your vote by [3 days after sending] ***
> > > >
> > > > The list of fixed issues:
> > > >
> > > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.1/CHANGES.txt
> > > >
> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5),
> > > > and test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.1-incubating-rc2/
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon:
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.1-rc2
> > > >
> > > > The KEYS file:
> > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sqoop/KEYS
> > > >
> >
|