Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B43200B9B for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:37:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E1525160AD4; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A892160ACA for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:37:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 89201 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2016 20:37:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact reviews-help@spark.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list reviews@spark.apache.org Received: (qmail 89190 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2016 20:37:09 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:37:09 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 9B13DE0061; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:37:09 +0000 (UTC) From: davies To: reviews@spark.apache.org Reply-To: reviews@spark.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] spark issue #13571: [SPARK-15369][WIP][RFC][PySpark][SQL] Expose potential t... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20161012203709.9B13DE0061@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:37:09 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:37:12 -0000 Github user davies commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571 Thanks for the prototype and sending the PR out, this looks interesting. I don't know how mature Jython currently is, never heard a company who use it. The last release took to years from beta to release, maybe that's a signal that the community behind Jython is not that active. The license Jython use is unique, I don't know whether it is OK to package with Spark or not. Also the standalone jar is 37M, that's pretty big for a experimental feature. This PR also introduce a public API, even we mark it as experimental, it still require some effort to maintain it even deprecate and remove it. I'm sure it's worth or not. We could leave the JIRA and PR open to gather more feedback, it could be useful in case that some people want to try it out. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org