Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-spark-reviews-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-spark-reviews-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C2BF19924 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 17:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99288 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2016 17:49:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spark-reviews-archive@spark.apache.org Received: (qmail 99266 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2016 17:49:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact reviews-help@spark.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list reviews@spark.apache.org Received: (qmail 99253 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2016 17:49:00 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2016 17:49:00 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 6F2B3DFE16; Thu, 5 May 2016 17:49:00 +0000 (UTC) From: MLnick To: reviews@spark.apache.org Reply-To: reviews@spark.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-15139][SPARK-15092][PYSPARK][ML] Pyspar... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20160505174900.6F2B3DFE16@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 17:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12919#discussion_r62224930 --- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py --- @@ -743,6 +743,18 @@ def treeWeights(self): """Return the weights for each tree""" return list(self._call_java("javaTreeWeights")) + @property --- End diff -- Yeah - may as well leave it for now. Perhaps later it may make sense to refactor it into one of the traits for Scala and Python On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 17:22, Seth Hendrickson wrote: > In python/pyspark/ml/regression.py > : > > > @@ -743,6 +743,18 @@ def treeWeights(self): > > """Return the weights for each tree""" > > return list(self._call_java("javaTreeWeights")) > > > > + @property > > This question applies to Scala API as well. Partly, I think, because in > the Scala API things were done incrementally. But also because there may be > some hope in the future that more predictors provide feature importances, > and then it could be an abstract method in the Predictor class instead. I > don't know that there's a better reason. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > > --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org