spark-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From srowen <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4665] [SPARK-4666] Improve YarnAllocato...
Date Sat, 07 Feb 2015 23:23:48 GMT
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3525#issuecomment-73388468
  
    FWIW I think the logic behind the existing parameters is: 7% should be enough for anyone.
And if it isn't, they know it, and have a clear idea of just how much they want the overhead
to be. Or: if 7% is consistently not enough, it should be higher, like 10%. I'd leave the
existing param unless it's obviously problematic.
    
    But that's separate from the question here, of whether lots of these strings could be
specified in mega or gigabytes. Is that still something that can move forward? the refactoring
of all that seems helpful in any event.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


Mime
View raw message