Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D40200C00 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:03:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 60A70160B4B; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B4CE7160B49 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:03:00 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 5310 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2017 22:02:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@spark.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@spark.apache.org Received: (qmail 5082 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2017 22:02:59 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:02:59 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00BE2C2AB9 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joseph K. Bradley (JIRA)" To: issues@spark.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-5535) Add parameter for storage levels MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:03:01 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15796294#comment-15796294 ] Joseph K. Bradley edited comment on SPARK-5535 at 1/3/17 10:02 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------- This issue came up in [SPARK-19007], so I'd like to pick it up again. I'd like people's thoughts on two questions: * Should we add a special parameter value which matches in the input DataFrame's storage level? * What should the default value be? ** Maintain current behavior: MEMORY_ONLY ** (Probably) optimize for most use cases: Match input storage level was (Author: josephkb): This issue came up in [SPARK-19007], so I'd like to pick it up again. I'd like people's thoughts on one question: Should we add a special parameter value which matches in the input DataFrame's storage level? It might be reasonable to use that as the default. > Add parameter for storage levels > -------------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-5535 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5535 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ML > Reporter: Xiangrui Meng > > Add a special parameter type for storage levels that takes the string representation of StorageLevels. > This value can be used when ML algorithms persist data internally. > Specifically, add a new {{Param[String]}} which takes the storage level. This can go in sharedParams. It should be added to algorithms individually in subtasks. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org