spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: GraphX-related "open" issues
Date Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:09:05 GMT
Thanks for your comment, Dongjin!
I have a pretty basic and also important question; why do you implement
these features as  a third-party library (and then upload them to the spark
packages https://spark-packages.org/)? ISTM graphx has already necessary
and sufficient APIs for these third-party ones.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Dongjin Lee <dongjin@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am currently working on SPARK-15880[^1] and also have some interest
> on SPARK-7244[^2] and SPARK-7257[^3]. In fact, SPARK-7244 and SPARK-7257
> have some importance on graph analysis field.
> Could you make them an exception? Since I am working on graph analysis, I
> hope to take them.
>
> If needed, I can take SPARK-10335 and SPARK-8497 after them.
>
> Thanks,
> Dongjin
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> WontFix or Later is fine. There's not really any practical distinction. I
>> figure that if something times out and is closed, it's very unlikely to be
>> looked at again. Therefore marking it as something to do 'later' seemed
>> less accurate.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:30 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank for your comment!
>>> I'm just thinking I'll set "Won't Fix" though, "Later" is also okay.
>>> But, I re-checked "Contributing to JIRA Maintenance" in the contribution
>>> guide (http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html) and
>>> I couldn't find any setting policy about "Later".
>>> So, IMO it's okay to set "Won't Fix" for now and those who'd like to
>>> make prs feel free to (re?-)open tickets.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Takeshi.
>>>
>>> > So, IMO it seems okay to close tickets about "Improvement" and "New
>>> Feature" for now.
>>>
>>> I'm just wondering about what kind of field value you want to fill in
>>> the `Resolution` field for those issues.
>>>
>>> Maybe, 'Later'? Or, 'Won't Fix'?
>>>
>>> Bests,
>>> Dongjoon.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> Takeshi Yamamuro
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Dongjin Lee*
>
>
> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
> <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
>



-- 
---
Takeshi Yamamuro

Mime
View raw message