spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.1 (RC2)
Date Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:19:07 GMT
Hi,

I keep asking myself why are you guys not including -Pmesos in your
builds? Is this on purpose or have you overlooked it?

Pozdrawiam,
Jacek Laskowski
----
https://medium.com/@jaceklaskowski/
Mastering Apache Spark 2.0 http://bit.ly/mastering-apache-spark
Follow me at https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski


On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> I compiled and tested on the following two systems.
>
> - CentOS 7.2 / Oracle JDK 1.8.0_77 / R 3.3.1 with -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7
> -Pkinesis-asl -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Dsparkr
> - CentOS 7.2 / Open JDK 1.8.0_102 with -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl
> -Phive -Phive-thriftserver
>
> Bests,
> Dongjoon.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not that it could fix the issue but no -Pmesos?
>>
>> Jacek
>>
>>
>> On 24 Sep 2016 12:08 a.m., "Sean Owen" <sowen@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 Signatures and hashes check out. I checked that the Kinesis
>>> assembly artifacts are not present.
>>>
>>> I compiled and tested on Java 8 / Ubuntu 16 with -Pyarn -Phive
>>> -Phive-thriftserver -Phadoop-2.7 -Psparkr and only saw one test
>>> problem. This test never completed. If nobody else sees it, +1,
>>> assuming it's a bad test or env issue.
>>>
>>> - should clone and clean line object in ClosureCleaner *** FAILED ***
>>>   isContain was true Interpreter output contained 'Exception':
>>>   Welcome to
>>>         ____              __
>>>        / __/__  ___ _____/ /__
>>>       _\ \/ _ \/ _ `/ __/  '_/
>>>      /___/ .__/\_,_/_/ /_/\_\   version 2.0.1
>>>         /_/
>>>
>>>   Using Scala version 2.11.8 (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0_91)
>>>   Type in expressions to have them evaluated.
>>>   Type :help for more information.
>>>
>>>   scala> // Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
>>>
>>>
>>>   // Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
>>>
>>>   org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job 0 cancelled because
>>> SparkContext was shut down
>>>     at
>>> org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler$$anonfun$cleanUpAfterSchedulerStop$1.apply(DAGScheduler.scala:818)
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> wrote:
>>> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>> > version
>>> > 2.0.1. The vote is open until Sunday, Sep 25, 2016 at 23:59 PDT and
>>> > passes
>>> > if a majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.1
>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The tag to be voted on is v2.0.1-rc2
>>> > (04141ad49806a48afccc236b699827997142bd57)
>>> >
>>> > This release candidate resolves 284 issues:
>>> > https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.1-jira
>>> >
>>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc2-bin/
>>> >
>>> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>>> >
>>> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1199
>>> >
>>> > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc2-docs/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Q: How can I help test this release?
>>> > A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>> > an
>>> > existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>> > reporting any regressions from 2.0.0.
>>> >
>>> > Q: What justifies a -1 vote for this release?
>>> > A: This is a maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.  Bugs already
>>> > present
>>> > in 2.0.0, missing features, or bugs related to new features will not
>>> > necessarily block this release.
>>> >
>>> > Q: What happened to 2.0.1 RC1?
>>> > A: There was an issue with RC1 R documentation during release candidate
>>> > preparation. As a result, rc1 was canceled before a vote was called.
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
>>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org


Mime
View raw message