Mailing-List: contact dev-help@spark.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPh_B=aVEt4mGX+dY9CAsSowtUkMpDG9BzSVvquC3e1HUgb9ag@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMAsSd+wYTgXQ-HQ8yy1MNYyU8AxaEFuNxEY5=_siD6Vkg0ZYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPh_B=ZW74vxdgTbiDCyzPYFYX3XC5XENtzQug36weKpvQMAoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPh_B=aVEt4mGX+dY9CAsSowtUkMpDG9BzSVvquC3e1HUgb9ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:10:22 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAJgQjQ9NEJXFvd9JmScXWhvgj6TXtKRMceWS1pBUPZ=QsQxk8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.5.1 (RC1)
From: Xiangrui Meng <mengxr@gmail.com>
To: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Cc: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>, Richard Hillegas <rhilleg@us.ibm.com>,
	"dev@spark.apache.org" <dev@spark.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1. Checked user guide and API doc, and ran some MLlib and SparkR
examples. -Xiangrui

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> wrote:
> I'm going to +1 this myself. Tested on my laptop.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> wrote:
>>
>> I forked a new thread for this. Please discuss NOTICE file related things
>> there so it doesn't hijack this thread.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Richard Hillegas <rhilleg@us.ibm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Under your guidance, I would be happy to help compile a NOTICE file
>>> > which
>>> > follows the pattern used by Derby and the JDK. This effort might
>>> > proceed in
>>> > parallel with vetting 1.5.1 and could be targeted at a later release
>>> > vehicle. I don't think that the ASF's exposure is greatly increased by
>>> > one
>>> > more release which follows the old pattern.
>>>
>>> I'd prefer to use the ASF's preferred pattern, no? That's what we've
>>> been trying to do and seems like we're even required to do so, not
>>> follow a different convention. There is some specific guidance there
>>> about what to add, and not add, to these files. Specifically, because
>>> the AL2 requires downstream projects to embed the contents of NOTICE,
>>> the guidance is to only include elements in NOTICE that must appear
>>> there.
>>>
>>> Put it this way -- what would you like to change specifically? (you
>>> can start another thread for that)
>>>
>>> >> My assessment (just looked before I saw Sean's email) is the same as
>>> >> his. The NOTICE file embeds other projects' licenses.
>>> >
>>> > This may be where our perspectives diverge. I did not find those
>>> > licenses
>>> > embedded in the NOTICE file. As I see it, the licenses are cited but
>>> > not
>>> > included.
>>>
>>> Pretty sure that was meant to say that NOTICE embeds other projects'
>>> "notices", not licenses. And those notices can have all kinds of
>>> stuff, including licenses.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@spark.apache.org
>>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@spark.apache.org