spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reynold Xin <>
Subject Re: How to track issues that must wait for Spark 2.x in JIRA?
Date Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:47:16 GMT
It seems to me having a version that is 2+ is good for that? Once we move
to 2.0, we can retag those that are not going to be fixed in 2.0 as 2.0.1
or 2.1.0 .

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Sean Owen <> wrote:

> Patrick and I were chatting about how to handle several issues which
> clearly need a fix, and are easy, but can't be implemented until a
> next major release like Spark 2.x since it would change APIs.
> Examples:
> We could simply make version 2.0.0 in JIRA. Although straightforward,
> it might imply that release planning has begun for 2.0.0.
> The version could be called "2+" for now to better indicate its status.
> There is also a "Later" JIRA resolution. Although resolving the above
> seems a little wrong, it might be reasonable if we're sure to revisit
> "Later", well, at some well defined later. The three issues above risk
> getting lost in the shuffle.
> We also wondered whether using "Later" is good or bad. It takes items
> off the radar that aren't going to be acted on anytime soon -- and
> there are lots of those right now. It might send a message that these
> will be revisited when they are even less likely to if resolved.
> Any opinions?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message