Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-spark-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-spark-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81C3E109DD for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 19:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52716 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2014 19:29:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spark-dev-archive@spark.apache.org Received: (qmail 52629 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2014 19:29:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@spark.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@spark.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@spark.apache.org Received: (qmail 52621 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2014 19:29:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 19:29:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of debasish.das83@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.50] (HELO mail-pa0-f50.google.com) (209.85.220.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 19:29:20 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id kq14so2182737pab.9 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:28:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OcGXPHZ4T4s7fQoKyvsCOAehY+6m8HdKir6vki9COY0=; b=bOA2bRIhFyMSlYonAeLYkMmfoOimJ4aAHHxBdPPARbn/bUDnVrTrRJp1JO6qcsfZdp yrPD3DJUVJJCm5XjugULmtR37gruQRO7IuaU19aIc+5aoztI8LxjXZVXZvAto5ZGL6/O 6IQ8PeRSgbz9EBF02jfRwq4+S5OR2ppAu+51T1dyEZqmEgYJNm1X6nu+1ax7ES3KSwpX /5NnL3lOjk2oT9VK8+JNnHOMyMHCoZTXTHdgh5OSpyVpexWukz+rYxnogErYrdgQQ19j 8xaTFIic2vSXMn8zuIT+g/aS27N8otvD3gaymL+NzEdpciR0kFQi/x/51L8wwbvK2QH8 mBuw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.151.205 with SMTP id us13mr10637239pab.93.1393702139412; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:28:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.1.4 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 11:28:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 11:28:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Development methodology From: Debasish Das To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b677694f1467804f390903a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b677694f1467804f390903a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, We have a mirror repo of spark at our internal stash. We are adding changes to a fork of the mirror so that down the line we can push the contributions back to Spark git. I am not sure what's the exact the development methodology we should follow as things are a bit complicated due to enterprise stash. Any suggestions would be great. I have follow usecases: 1. Ask for a pull request and push the changes from stash mirror upstream to the spark apache git. 2. I am working on 2 PR that are currently open. What's the best way to work on those ? Can I get those PR through the stash mirror of Spark git or those PRs are only available on github ? Thanks. Deb --047d7b677694f1467804f390903a--