spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Azuryy Yu <azury...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)
Date Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:31:00 GMT
Hi,
Spark-0.8.1 supports yarn 0.22 right? where to find the release note?
Thanks.


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>wrote:

> Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release.
> Let's wait for his reply
>
> On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote:
>
> > Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something
> > different than this.
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Patrick,
> > >
> > > Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there
> > > even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artifact
> > > could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd party
> > > libraries in the binary jars.
> > >
> > > I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about his concern in
> > > general@ list.
> > >
> > > - Henry
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> Hey Henry,
> > >>
> > >> One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the binaries and
> > >> make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd like I could
> > >> add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are only voting on
> > >> the source.
> > >>
> > >> - Patrick
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra <
> > henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there as long as the
> > >>> VOTE is for the source.
> > >>>
> > >>> Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about his concern.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Henry
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra <
> > henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from
the
> > >>>> voting directory in your people.apache.org directory.
> > >>>> ASF release voting is for source code and not binaries, and
> > >>>> technically we provide binaries for convenience.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1] to let verify
> > signatures.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sorry for the late response to the VOTE thread, guys.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - Henry
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/spark/KEYS
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Patrick Wendell <
> pwendell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 5 PPMC +1's and
no 0
> > or -1
> > >>>>> votes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +1 (5 Total)
> > >>>>> Matei Zaharia*
> > >>>>> Nick Pentreath*
> > >>>>> Patrick Wendell*
> > >>>>> Prashant Sharma*
> > >>>>> Tom Graves*
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 0 (0 Total)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -1 (0 Total)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * = Binding Vote
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending this
to the
> > >>>>> general incubator list for a final vote from IPMC members.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-
> > >>>>> vote
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Evan Chan <ev@ooyala.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'd be personally fine with a standard workflow of assemble-deps
+
> > >>>>>> packaging just the Spark files as separate packages, if
it speeds
> up
> > >>>>>> everyone's development time.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark Hamstra <
> > mark@clearstorydata.com
> > >>>>>> >wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> > I don't know how to make sense of the numbers, but
here's what
> > I've got
> > >>>>>> > from a very small sample size.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message