spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Stead <paul.st...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposed rule for too many dots in From
Date Mon, 10 Jun 2019 18:43:29 GMT
Looks like it was hitting a fair amount of ham the last week or so.

https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190607-r1860743-n/T_AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS/detail

The last few days have looked a bit better:

https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190609-r1860879-n/T_AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS/detail
https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190610-r1860930-n/T_AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS/detail

3 days good performance on ruleqa equals promotion followed by a scoring
day.

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 19:13, Amir Caspi <cepheid@3phase.com> wrote:

> On Jan 26, 2019, at 10:27 AM, John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Amir Caspi wrote:
> >
> >> On Jan 15, 2019, at 8:46 AM, John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Dec 20, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Amir Caspi <Cepheid@3phase.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> header    AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS       From =~ /<(?:\w{2,}\.){2,}\w+@/
> >>>
> >>> Argh. I lost track of that over the holidays. Thanks for the reminder,
> adding it now.
> >>
> >> Anything interesting with the results on sandboxing this rule?
> >
> > Not really, at least not by itself.
>
> It looks like this rule was still being tested last month (I saw it
> hitting a bunch of my spams), but now appears to be gone (it's not hitting
> on spams that it normally would).  Did you decide it wasn't sufficiently
> useful, either alone or in meta?
>
> Cheers.
>
> --- Amir
>
>

Mime
View raw message