spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henrik K <h...@hege.li>
Subject Re: Masscheck statistics
Date Wed, 15 May 2019 13:41:00 GMT
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 02:15:19PM +0100, RW wrote:
> 
> Why are there no QA statistics for BAYES_* rules?

How do you propose to generate such statistics, when all contributors
already are supposed to have fully sorted ham/spam corpuses?  Seems kind of
redundant as all spam would hit BAYES_99 etc.

What comes to BAYES_* scores anyway, they are hand tweaked / immutable and
not subject to rescoring.

# make the Bayes scores unmutable (as discussed in bug 4505)
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4505

> Also why do all the network rule statistics come from a single
> contributor labelled 'jarif'? A corpus with only 484 ham in it.

Network rules are only run every saturday:
https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190511-r1859108-n

jarif has some flags wrong if doing it every day..


Mime
View raw message