spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Cole" <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com>
Subject Re: more spam is getting through :-(
Date Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:13:17 GMT
On 18 Mar 2019, at 0:45, John Hardin wrote:

> On Sun, 17 Mar 2019, James wrote:
>
>> On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote:
>>> On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the Bayes score for the missed spam?
>>
>> This is from a missed spam.
>> How do I see the bayes score?
>>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13)
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.2 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,
>> 	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_NONE,
>> 	SPF_HELO_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no
>> 	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
>>
>>
>> $ sudo sa-learn --dump magic
>> 0.000          0    4665448          0  non-token data: nspam
>> 0.000          0   51031938          0  non-token data: nham
>
> I'd generally expect those numbers to be somewhat reversed as most 
> people get more spam than ham...

This is not really true. Most people never get most of the spam that is 
aimed at them and many don't even have much aimed at them. Older, more 
exposed, and a few common role addresses (e.g. sales@, info@, etc.) can 
get immense amounts of spam while others in the same domain may get 
almost none.

Messages reaching the content filtering stage at many sites are a 
minority of all attempts to send mail. If a SMTP session never reaches 
DATA, SA never has a message to learn one way or the other.

Mime
View raw message