spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Why is RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET not '-lastexternal'?
Date Sat, 28 Jul 2018 17:13:04 GMT
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 18:12:42 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

> On 28.07.18 17:06, RW wrote:
> >I don't see anything on the site to suggest that it avoids listing
> >dynamic IP addresses. And here:
> >
> >  https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/357.html
> >
> >commenting on listing history it says:
> >
> >
> >  "One also has to remember that IP addresses change hands. Many ISPs
> >   assign IP addresses to customers dynamically, so addresses are
> >   changing all the time."  
> 
> and the point is?
> A-ha. ou put it in subject:
>  Re: Why is RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET not  '-lastexternal'?
> 
> well, the -lastexternal is for dynamic IPS, and spamcop lists spam
> sources, not (just) dynamic addresses.

Most -lastexternal lists are mixed dynamic/static. Deep checks should
be, and mostly are, list for exploitable servers or IP addresses under
the control of spammers (or very spam friendly ISPs). 

RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET seems to be an anomaly. 

Mime
View raw message